In a Decision – Kang v. Lan (an Unpublished Opinion) >> the Court Held:
The Appellate Division affirmed the Family Part decision even though the experts were inapposite as to determining fair market value of the Wife’s 100% owned sole proprietorship business. The family part judge took issue with both experts' opinions, and noted he "need not adopt the opinion of either expert in its entirety." As such, he used "parts of each expert's testimony and report and . . . formulated [his] own determination based upon certain indisputable facts, common sense, and realities."
The Appellate Division held the family part judge appropriately valued appellant's business and, based on his "feel for the case," distributed the marital property accordingly.