Retirement

In a Decision –   Fiore v. Fiore,  (an "Unreported Decision") >>   the Court Held:

The Appellate Division found that Trial judge considered all of the factors and did not abuse his discretion in rejecting expert's testimony and properly found plaintiff had difficulty saving for retirement and defendant did not need to retire for medical reasons.
Read more . . .

In a Decision –      Eddey v. Eddey,   (an "Unreported Decision") >>   the Court Held:

The Appellate Division affirmed the Trial Court decision and set forth that  

 ample evidence to terminate plaintiff's alimony obligations based on his retirement

It was reasonable for Husband to retire after reaching retirement age and facing termination from his previous job.
Read more . . .

In a Decision –     Landers v. Landers,    (an "Unreported Decision") >>   the Court Held:

The Appellate Division affirmed the Trial Court decision that maintained

Alimony but at a reduced amount.
Read more . . .

In a Decision –     Landers v. Landers,    (an "Unreported Decision") >>   the Court Held:

The Appellate Division affirmed the Trial Court decision that maintained

Alimony but at a reduced amount.
Read more . . .

In a Decision –     Landers v. Landers,    (an "Unreported Decision") >>   the Court Held:

The Appellate Division affirmed the Trial Court decision that maintained

Alimony but at a reduced amount.
Read more . . .

In a Decision –     Amzler v. Amzler,   (a "Reported Decision") >>   the Court Held:

The Appellate Division reversed the Trial Court and  held that a party

seeking to retire early who was divorced before the 2014 statute must

consider Wife’s ability to have saved for her retirement.
Read more . . .

In a Decision –      Coleman v. Coleman, Read more . . .

In a Decision –       Felton v. Felton,  (an "Unreported Decision") >>   the Court Held:

The Appellate Division reversed the Trial Court decision because the Trial Court applied a basis to the calculation of retirement benefits not as set forth in the Divorce Agreement.
Read more . . .

In a Decision –       Orlowski v. Orlowski, , (a "Reported Decision") >>   the Court Held:

The Appellate Division determined that Husband’s failures and deficiencies required that his retirement/annuity funds be utilized to pay Husband’s obligations including counsel fees.
Read more . . .

In a Decision –       Sowell-Zak v. Zak , (an "Unreported Decision") >>   the Court Held:

The Appellate Division affirmed the termination alimony based upon retirement.
Read more . . .