In a Decision – R.S. v. T.B., (an Unpublished Opinion) >> the Court Held:
The Appellate Division remanded the Family Part decision because the marital standard of living was not established either at the time of divorce or at the modification hearing, we reverse and remand for a hearing to first establish the marital standard of living, and then to address the issue of changed circumstances.
The Appellate Division stated:
When assessing whether an obligor's career change is a substantial change in circumstances, the court should "determine whether the obligor's decision is 'reasonable' under the circumstances and, ultimately, whether the advantages to the supporting spouse 'substantially outweigh' the disadvantages to the supported spouse."