In a Decision – K.S. v. J.S. (an "Unreported Decision") >> the Court Held:
The Appellate Division affirmed that the property was not subject to Equitable Distribution.
Plaintiff failed to establish the condominium increased in value during the marriage, or that his efforts allowed defendant to increase its value. While plaintiff is accurate that defendant paid the mortgage from funds acquired after marriage, the record also establishes that she deposited the rent collected on the condominium in that same account.