Child Relocation

In a Decision –       Ben-Haim v. New Israel Fund,  (an "Unreported Decision") >>   the Court Held:

The Appellate Division reversed the Trial Court’s determination that New Jersey had jurisdiction where all the connections of the children were in Pennsylvania where the child had resided notwithstanding the New Jersey Divorce.
Read more . . .

In a Decision –       Ben-Haim v. New Israel Fund,  (an "Unreported Decision") >>   the Court Held:

The Appellate Division affirmed the Trial Court’s determination that a non-US Defendant could not be sued in New Jersey without minimum contacts  to and with New Jersey.
Read more . . .

In a Decision –        Mirman v. Mirman,,, (an "Unreported Decision") >>   the Court Held:

The Appellate Division reversed and remanded the Trial Court’s determination because the children’s relocation to Husband's residence constitutes a change in circumstances requiring a reassessment of the child support obligations of the parties.
Read more . . .

In a  Decision – Bisbing v Bisbing  (a New Jersey Supreme Court Decision) >>   the Court Held:

The New Jersey Supreme Court determined that the Standard is “Best Interests” when there is shared legal custody.

In place of the Baures standard, courts should conduct a best interests analysis to determine “cause” under N.J.S.A.
Read more . . .