In a Decision – Fiore v. Fiore, (an "Unreported Decision") >> the Court Held:
The Appellate Division found that Trial judge considered all of the factors and did not abuse his discretion in rejecting expert's testimony and properly found plaintiff had difficulty saving for retirement and defendant did not need to retire for medical reasons.
Defendant contended his pulmonary diagnosis rendered him unable to work as a firefighter and his 2015 retirement was a change of circumstance warranting a change in alimony. Trial judge found defendant's medical expert was unpersuasive and defendant did not need to retire.