In a Decision K.J.B. v. E.O., (an "Unreported Decision") >> the Court Held:
The Appellate Division affirmed the Trial Court decision finding defendant engaged in cyber harassment.
The Appellant Division rejected defendant's arguments that the parties were professional commercial pornographic movie actors, and contended that the publishing or conveying of nude photos is constitutionally protected. Defendant's arguments that the sending of nude photos cannot constitute harassment were fruitless. That a photo might not be obscene does not mean its conveyance to another was not made with a purpose to harass the depicted person.