Child Support Overnight

In a Decision –        Mirman v. Mirman,,, (an "Unreported Decision") >>   the Court Held:

The Appellate Division reversed and remanded the Trial Court’s determination because the children’s relocation to Husband's residence constitutes a change in circumstances requiring a reassessment of the child support obligations of the parties.
Read more . . .

In a Decision –   Grohol v. Grohol, (an Unreported Decision Case) >>   the Court Held:

The Appellate Division affirmed – agreed with the Trial Court – that Father’s child support obligation should be increased, because Father was exercising considerably less parenting time than the parties contemplated in the Divorce Agreement and Father did not have the children for at least two overnights per week.
Read more . . .

In a  Decision – Raucci v. Valotta (an "Unreported Decision") >>   the Court Held:

The Appellate  Division determined that  notwithstanding the 50/50 Parenting (Visitation) Time and that the father picked the child up before noon and the child was returned after noon on the following day, the father was not entitled to two (2) overnights for child support purposes.

 The trial judge acted within his discretion when he rejected plaintiff’s argument that, because of his pick-up and drop off times, he had the child for more than 24 hours and had to be credited with two overnights when he picked the child up before noon and the child was returned after noon on the following day.