In a Decision – Muni v. Muni., (an Unpublished Opinion) >> the Court Held:
The Appellate Division affirmed the Family Part decision that determined that Defendant was served with a motion and failed to respond. The Court determined that the Motion had merit and the relief was granted as unopposed.
We recognize that defendant's attorney was not served with the motion; however, it is clear defendant had actual notice of the motion and received a notice to appear in court. Therefore, defendant's claim that he did not have notice of the motion is without merit. We are satisfied the motion judge did not abuse his discretion in finding plaintiff had served her motion on defendant.