In a Decision - L.W. v. A.W.,, (an "Unreported Decision") >> the Court Held:
The Appellate Division affirmed because the communications were written and delivered in a manner likely to cause annoyance or harm and the intent to harass could be inferred from the persistence.
In the four months between the order reinforcing the "no-contact order" from the divorce judgment and plaintiff's filing for the FRO, defendant sent 70 written communications blaming plaintiff for the divorce and accusing her of putting the children through "agony."