In a Decision – D.M.H. v. H.G.H., (an "Unreported Decision") >> the Court Held:
The Appellate Division affirmed the Trial Court decision and concluded that Wife had undertaken efforts as to Husband's Pre-Marital Real Estate.
Having carefully reviewed the record, we reject defendant's argument that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding plaintiff a percentage of the Hoboken unit sale proceeds. The record contains evidence the parties pooled their resources when they lived in the property and paid its mortgage. In addition, plaintiff managed the property for years when it served as an income producing rental unit. These facts constitute sufficient support for the trial court's conclusion the Hoboken property was an active immune asset of the marriage, subject to equitable distribution.